Comments on: CNN, Amanpour and Debategraph http://opentopersuasion.com/2009/09/23/cnn-amanpour-and-debategraph/ Open reasoning in a complex world Mon, 10 May 2010 13:07:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Debategraph « Wir sprechen Online. http://opentopersuasion.com/2009/09/23/cnn-amanpour-and-debategraph/comment-page-1/#comment-537 Debategraph « Wir sprechen Online. Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:48:12 +0000 http://opentopersuasion.com/?p=635#comment-537 [...] Publishing (268), Social Media (428), Visualisation (2), Web (1,639), Wikis (66) A wiki debate visualisation tool, creative commons project, global graph of debates: Debategraph; http://j.mp/10wSsb [...] [...] Publishing (268), Social Media (428), Visualisation (2), Web (1,639), Wikis (66) A wiki debate visualisation tool, creative commons project, global graph of debates: Debategraph; http://j.mp/10wSsb [...]

]]> By: David http://opentopersuasion.com/2009/09/23/cnn-amanpour-and-debategraph/comment-page-1/#comment-523 David Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:50:31 +0000 http://opentopersuasion.com/?p=635#comment-523 Hi, Raiko: Many thanks for your feedback here and for suggesting the new position in your comment on the map. I have started to add the new position and the supportive argument that you suggest here: http://debategraph.org/Stream.aspx?nID=33008 If you would like to expand on your reasoning, either here or via the comments on the map, I would delighted to enter the arguments on your behalf. We are mid-stream in a significant round of changes to Debategraph and during this phase the site may not be fully optimised across all browsers types and versions. From the behaviour you are describing, it looks like you may have been using a version of Opera for which the site is temporarily not optimised. I apologize for any inconvenience while this is the case, and Peter and I will aim to address this as soon as practical. In the meantime, if you would like me to guide you through any aspect of the process please don't hesitate to contact me directly at david [at] debategraph [dot] org All the best -- and thanks again, David Hi, Raiko: Many thanks for your feedback here and for suggesting the new position in your comment on the map. I have started to add the new position and the supportive argument that you suggest here:

http://debategraph.org/Stream.aspx?nID=33008

If you would like to expand on your reasoning, either here or via the comments on the map, I would delighted to enter the arguments on your behalf.

We are mid-stream in a significant round of changes to Debategraph and during this phase the site may not be fully optimised across all browsers types and versions. From the behaviour you are describing, it looks like you may have been using a version of Opera for which the site is temporarily not optimised. I apologize for any inconvenience while this is the case, and Peter and I will aim to address this as soon as practical.

In the meantime, if you would like me to guide you through any aspect of the process please don’t hesitate to contact me directly at david [at] debategraph [dot] org

All the best — and thanks again,

David

]]> By: Raiko http://opentopersuasion.com/2009/09/23/cnn-amanpour-and-debategraph/comment-page-1/#comment-522 Raiko Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:44:47 +0000 http://opentopersuasion.com/?p=635#comment-522 I tried to add a node to the Afghanistan debate that was missing. The right one. But alas, updating freezed. And the editor jumped to step 3 before I could enter something under step 2. No pasting was possible. The whole thing is cumbersome in use. The right thing to do is often obvious and simple. Compared to that, the debategraph is a journey for travel babes. I tried to add a node to the Afghanistan debate that was missing. The right one. But alas, updating freezed. And the editor jumped to step 3 before I could enter something under step 2. No pasting was possible.
The whole thing is cumbersome in use. The right thing to do is often obvious and simple. Compared to that, the debategraph is a journey for travel babes.

]]>