Blogging about Debatemapper
We spend much of our lives debating with each other—and living in the consequences of those debates. But how often do we do it well?
Can we improve the quality of our public and private deliberation?
And, if so, what difference would that make?
That’s the starting point for Debatemapper.
Let’s see where it takes us.
September 12, 2007 | Filed Under Debatemapper
Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Posts
- Each word is in conversation with every other word and itself
- From illiteracy, to literacy, to holiteracy
- Daologue
- If the internet is making you stupid, you’re not using it right
- Debategraph named as one of the AASL’s Best Websites for Teaching and Learning
- Mapping the Contours of Thought…
- CNN, Amanpour and Debategraph
- Collaborative Democracy in the White House
- Mapping the Core Principles for Public Engagement
- Integrating Debategraph with SharePoint
- Crowdsourcing Public Services 2.0
- Mapping the Power of Information Taskforce Report
- Public Services 2.0
- Dissecting the G-20 Communiqué
- Debategraph in the Classroom
Categories
- Argument map
- Artificial Intelligence
- Awards
- Barack Obama
- Climate Change
- CNN Amanpour
- Collaboration
- Collaborative Democracy
- Collective Intelligence
- Company
- Computers
- Consultation
- Creative Commons
- Critical Thinking
- Daologue
- Debate
- Debate Map
- Debategraph
- Debatemapper
- Deliberation
- Downing Street
- Drugs
- E-democracy
- Education
- eGovernment
- Essence
- Ethics
- European Commission
- Gaza
- Genetics
- Global Warming
- Governance
- Government 2.0
- Holiteracy
- Humour
- ID Cards
- Identity
- Israel
- John McCain
- Media
- Microsoft
- Middle East
- Open Education
- Open Government
- Philosophy
- Poetry
- Politics
- Progressive
- Public Policy
- Public Service Broadcasting
- Robots
- RSA
- Semantic web
- SharePoint
- Singularity
- Sport
- The Independent
- Tony Blair
- Turing
- United Nations
- US Election
- Video
- Visualisation
- WAVE-Debate
- Web 2.0
- White House
Archives
-
About
A blog by David Price, co-founder of: DebateGraph.org
Twitter:@DebateGraph
Friend feed: David Price
Email: david AT debategraph DOT org.
-
Blogroll
- Al Selvin
- Alex Iskold
- Andrew Chadwick
- Andrew McAfee
- Anthony Judge
- Brad Feld
- Brian Barder
- Clay Shirky
- Connected Republic
- ConvinceMe
- Craig Newmark
- CreateDebate
- Dave Briggs
- Dave Winer
- David Brin
- David Osimo
- David Weinberger
- David Wilcox
- Debategraph
- Debatepedia
- Debatewise
- DeepDebate
- Delib
- Deliberative Democracy
- Doc Searls
- Don Dodge
- Donald Clark
- Ellee Seymour
- Emma Mulqueeny
- Essence 2009
- Fred Wilson
- FutureGov
- Gareth Renowden
- George Mobus
- Global Sensemaking
- Headshift
- Howard Rheingold
- Ideal Government
- IPDI
- Jack Park
- Jay Cross
- Jeff Conklin
- Jeff Jarvis
- Jeremy Gould
- Jeremy Gould
- Jerry Fishenden
- Jimmy Leach
- Joel Spolsky
- John Daly
- Joseph Laronge
- Josh Kopelman
- JP Rangaswami
- Kevin Kelly
- Kim Sbarcea
- Lawrence Lessig
- Learning Irregulars
- Lloyd Shepherd
- Marc Andreessen
- Mark Klein
- Mark Pesce
- Mark Surman
- Mathew Ingram
- Matthew Taylor
- mySociety
- NCDD
- Opposing Views
- Overcoming Bias
- Paul Evans
- Paul Kedrosky
- Pep-Net
- Personal Democracy Forum
- Peter Tillers
- Philippe Boukobza
- Philosophy Bites
- Podnosh
- ProCon.org
- Ross Ferguson
- Ross Mayfield
- Seb Schmoller
- Simon Buckingham Shum
- Simon Dickson
- Steph Gray
- Steven Clift
- Stitt Feld Handy
- Stowe Boyd
- Strahan Spencer
- Sunlight Foundation
- Tim Bonnemann
- Tim van Gelder
- Tom Coates
- Tom Evslin
- Tom Watson
- Trinifar
- Umair Haque
- William Heath